ارائه چارچوب حکمرانی دانش در شبکه‌های اجتماعی

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری، مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشیار، مدیریت، دپارتمان مهندسی صنایع، دانشگاه امام حسین (ع)، تهران، ایران.

3 دانشیار ، مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

4 دانشیار، مدیریت، دانشکده مهندسی صنایع، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

این مقاله، با طرح این مسئله که هدایت‌پذیری دانش در بین گروه‌های مختلف دانشی، به‌سختی انجام می‌شود، به ارائه الگویی برای حکمرانی دانش در این مورد با استفاده از شبکه‌های اجتماعی می­پردازد. ازآنجاکه مرور ادبیات، به‌خوبی این باور را که حکمرانی دانش تنها در حد مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای و نه میدانی، انجام‌شده است را به اثبات می­رساند و نشانه­های لازم برای ارائه یک طراحی منسجم را نیز ارائه نمی­نماید. ازاین‌رو محقق، بافهم وضعیت، نسبت به استفاده از روش تحقیقات علم طراحی به‌عنوان روشی اقدام محور، درصدد فهم وضعیت، شناسایی نیازها و اهداف طراحی، ارائه طراحی و سپس ایجاد مصنوع لازم و درنهایت پیاده‌سازی آن در موردمطالعه، اقدام نموده است. استفاده از ابزار شبکه‌های اجتماعی به‌عنوان یک فناوری اجتماعی که می­تواند سبب تحول‌آفرینی شود، کمک شایانی به ارائه قابلیت‌های موردنیاز در طراحی منحصربه‌فرد در حوزه حکمرانی دانش نمود. نتایج ارائه‌شده نشان داد که با استفاده از منطق­های نوین این قبیل فناوری­ها می­توان بسیاری از مشکلاتی که ناشی از ترس، عدم اعتماد، نبود انگیزه، عدم فعالیت و ... قلمداد می­شود را برطرف نماید.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Proposing Knowledge Governance Framework in social Networks

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Reza Ghodoosi 1
  • Jafar Mahmudi 2
  • Mohammad Musakhani 3
  • Mostafa Jafari 4
1 PhD, Information Technology Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Prof, Management, Industrial Engineering Department, University of Imam Hossein, Tehran, Iran.
3 Associate Prof, Information Technology Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
4 Associate Prof, Management, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and technology, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

This article addresses the governance mechanisms required among different knowledge groups, which are so hard to be formed, to design a knowledge governance framework in social networks. There are many problems among different knowledge groups when trying to make knowledge endeavours and obtaining a knowledge-based product/service. Reviewing the literature show strong recommendations to study the mentioned phenomena, not only using less library studies, but also using pragmatism approach and the action-based research methodologies. By understanding the situation, the researchers has used design science research (DSR) methodology to find the needs, proposing a design and make an artifact due to the problem, all based on the DSR guidelines and principles. By study different Entrepreneurial firms (start-ups) in a boot camp, all have the problems of knowledge gathering, communications between different knowledge sections and etc., the design process has been implemented and evaluated.  The verification and validation results showed significant improvement in knowledge groups’ relations while many of them had more agility and also better results.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Design science research
  • Entrepreneurial firms
  • Informal social network
  • Knowledge governance

جعفر محمودی، زهرا اصلانی. 1393. حکمرانی نیک الکترونیک. دست نامه فناوری اطلاعات. مرکز چاپ و انتشارات دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی.

Ahern, T., Leavy, B., & Byrne, P. J. 2014. “Complex project management as complex problem solving: A distributed knowledge management perspective”. International Journal of Project Management32(8), 1371-1381.

Anderson-Lehman, R., Watson, H. J., Wixom, B. H., & Hoffer, J. A. 2008. “Flying High with Real-Time Business Intelligence”. Handbook on Decision Support Systems 2 (pp.443-462).

Baskerville, R. L., Kaul, M., & Storey, V. C. 2015. “Genres of Inquiry in Design-Science Research: Justification and Evaluation of Knowledge Production”. Mis Quarterly, 39(3), 541-564.

Burlamaqui, L. 2012. “Knowledge Governance: An Analytical Approach and its Policy Implications”. Knowledge Governance: Reasserting the Public Interest, 3-26.

Cao, Y., & Xiang, Y. 2013. “The impact of knowledge governance on knowledge sharing: the mediating role of the guanxi effect”. Chinese Management Studies, 7(1), 36-52.

Caner, T., Cohen, S. K., & Pil, F. 2017. “Firm heterogeneity in complex problem solving: A knowledge‐based look at invention”. Strategic Management Journal38(9), 1791-1811.

Choo, A. S., Nag, R., & Xia, Y. 2015. “The role of executive problem solving in knowledge accumulation and manufacturing improvements”. Journal of Operations Management36, 63-74.

Choi, B., Poon, S. K., & Davis, J. G. 2008. “Effects of knowledge management strategy on organizational performance: A complementarity theory-based approach”. Omega, 36(2), 235-251.

Ellison, N. B., Gibbs, J. L., & Weber, M. S. 2015. “The use of enterprise social network sites for knowledge sharing in distributed organizations: The role of organizational affordances”. American Behavioral Scientist59(1), 103-123.

Foss, N. J. (2007). The emerging knowledge governance approach: Challenges and characteristics. Organization14(1), 29-52.

Foss, N. J. a. M., S. 2009. “Knowledge governance: what have we learned? And where are we heading? Knowledge Governance: Perspectives, Processes and Problems” (pp. 272–288). Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Foss, N. J., Husted, K., & Michailova, S. (2010). Governing knowledge sharing in organizations: Levels of analysis, governance mechanisms, and research directions. Journal of Management studies47(3), 455-482.

Fuller, S. 2017. “In search of vehicles for knowledge governance: on the need for institutions that creatively destroy social capital”. In The governance of knowledge (pp. 75-114). Routledge.

Furman, J. L., Jensen, K., & Murray, F. 2012. “Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine”. Research Policy, 41(2), 276-290.

Gebba, T. R. 2014. “The Role of Governance in Planning and Implementing Knowledge Management Strategy in the UAE: The Case of RTA”. International Journal of Business Research and Development (IJBRD), 2(4).

Gerritsen, A. L., Stuiver, M., & Termeer, C. J. 2013. “Knowledge governance: An exploration of principles, impact, and barriers”. Science and Public Policy, sct012.

Heimeriks, K. H. 2010. “Confident or competent? How to avoid superstitious learning in alliance portfolios”. Long Range Planning, 43(1), 57-84.

Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. 2004. “Design Science in InformationSystems Research”. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75-105.

Holloway, S. S., van Eijnatten, F. M., Romme, A. G. L., & Demerouti, E. 2016. “Developing actionable knowledge on value crafting: a design science approach”. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1639-1643.

Hong, D. C., & Liang, S. 2015. “Media Characteristics and Social Networks-enabled Knowledge Integration in Cooperative Work”. Procedia Computer Science, 60, 246-255.

Huang, M.-C., Chiu, Y.-P., & Lu, T.-C. 2013. “Knowledge governance mechanisms and repatriate's knowledge sharing: the mediating roles of motivation and opportunity”. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(5), 677-694.

Jalonen, H. 2014. “A framework for dealing with fundamental knowledge problems through social media”. VINE: The journal of information and knowledge management systems44(4), 558-578.

Koliba, C. J., Meek, J. W., Zia, A., & Mills, R. W. 2018. “Governance networks in public administration and public policy”. Routledge.

Kozhakhmet, S., & Nazri, M. 2017. “Governing knowledge sharing behaviour in post-Soviet Kazakhstan”. Journal of Workplace Learning, 29(3).

Lam, A. 1997. “Embedded firms, embedded knowledge: Problems of collaboration and knowledge transfer in global cooperative ventures”. Organization studies18(6), 973-996.

Lawson, B., Petersen, K. J., Cousins, P. D., & Handfield, R. B. 2009. “Knowledge sharing in interorganizational product development teams: The effect of formal and informal socialization mechanisms”. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 156-172.

Lieto, A., Lebiere, C., & Oltramari, A. 2018. “The knowledge level in cognitive architectures: Current limitations and possible developments”. Cognitive Systems Research48, 39-55.

Manning, S. 2017. “Building Core Teams and Flexible Partner Pools for Interorganizational Projects: The Rise of Project Network Organizations.”

Michailova, S., & Foss, N. J. 2009. “Knowledge governance: themes and questions”. Knowledge governance: Processes and perspectives, 1-24.

Michailova, S., & Mustaffa, Z. 2012. “Subsidiary knowledge flows in multinational corporations: Research accomplishments, gaps, and opportunities”. Journal of World Business, 47(3), 383-396.

Mohedano-Suanes, A., & del Mar Benavides-Espinosa, M. 2013. “Technology transfer, specific local knowledge and entrepreneurial partner control in international joint ventures”. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9(1), 95-112.

Müller, K. 2010. “Knowledge Governance: The Social Dimension of Innovation”. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 4(1), 4-13.

Polanyi, M. 2015. “Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy”. University of Chicago Press.

Pemsel, S., Söderlund, J., & Wiewiora, A. 2018. “Contextualising capability development: configurations of knowledge governance mechanisms in project-based organizations”. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1-20.

Pemsel, S., Wiewiora, A., Müller, R., Aubry, M., & Brown, K. 2014. “A conceptualization of knowledge governance in project-based organizations”. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1411-1422.

Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. 2008. “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research”. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45-77.

Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., & Niehaves, B. 2018. “Design science research genres: introduction to the special issue on exemplars and criteria for applicable design science research”.

Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. 2008. “Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness”. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(2), 229-252.

Ren, Z. 2007. “Go beyond knowledge management: conceptions, framework and application of knowledge governance theory”. Science Research Management, 28(1), 20-26.

Rumelt, R. P. 2012. “Good strategy/bad strategy: The difference and why it matters”. Strategic Direction28(8).

Sacchetti, S., & Sugden, R. 2008. “Knowledge Governance and Creativity in the Organisation of Production: What is in the Interests of'Publics'?”.

Schroeder, A., & Pauleen, D. 2007. “KM governance: investigating the case of a knowledge intensive research organisation”. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 20(4), 414-431.

Schroeder, A., Pauleen, D., & Huff, S. 2012. “KM governance: the mechanisms for guiding and controlling KM programs”. Journal of knowledge management, 16(1), 3-21.

Schrier, K. 2016. “Knowledge games: How playing games can solve problems, create insight, and make change”. JHU Press.

Tan, K., Yuen, Y & Ha, L. 2018. “Factors affecting knowledge governance implementation among Malaysian SMEs”.Management Science Letters , 8(5), 405-416.

Van Kerkhoff, L. 2013. “Knowledge governance for sustainable development: a review”. Challenges in Sustainability1(2), 82.

Van de Ven, A. H. 2007. “Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research”. Oxford University Press on Demand.

Wilbanks, J., & Rossini, C. 2012. “An Interoperability principle for Knowledge Creation and Governance: The role of emerging institutions”. Knowledge Governance: Reasserting the Public Interest, 199.

Windsperger, J., Hendrikse, G. W., Cliquet, G., & Ehrmann, T. 2017. “Governance and strategy of entrepreneurial networks: an introduction”. Small Business Economics, 1-6.