A Systematic Review of Social Commerce Adoption by Customers

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Nasibeh Pouti 1
Mohammad Taghi Taghavifard 2
Mohammad Reza Taghva 3
Mohammad Fathian 4
1 Instructor, Department of Information Technology Management, Faculty of Engineering, Sayyed Jamaleddine Asadabadi University, Hamedan, Iran. PhD, Department of Information Technology Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Prof., Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
3 Prof., Department of System Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
4 Prof., Department of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/aimj.2021.134763
Abstract
Social commerce as a new paradigm of commerce has been considered for about a decade. The first attempt to apply this paradigm is to examine its acceptance process. In this research, social commerce acceptance studies have been reviewed with primary and secondary search strategies. The main purpose of this research is to examine the acceptance process from different perspectives and to analyze the research gap that paves the way for future research in this field. Survey perspectives include focus on acceptance steps, basic theories used, focus on value creation, extent of customer engagement, focus on innovation, type of media used, geographical focus, type of business transactions concerned, their influential factors, thematic focus and applied focus area, research methods used, data analysis tools and statistical samples. Accordingly, 203 articles were reviewed with two approaches: quantitative analysis and gap analysis. Quantitative analysis of studies showed that acceptance technology as the highest theories, social networks as most platforms, trust as the most widely used factor, Asia as most continental geographical focus, China and the United States as the most geographical focus of the country. Based on the gap analysis, service-oriented businesses, qualitative methods and modeling, focusing on e-commerce platforms and equipping them with social commerce constructs, and focusing on business-to-business transactions were identified as research gaps.

Keywords

Abed, S., Dwivedi, Y., Williams, M. (2015). Social Media as a Bridge to E-commerce Adoption in SMEs: A Systematic Literature Review. The Marketing Review, 15(1), 39-57.
Aghakhani, N., Karimi, J. & Salehan, M. (2018). A Unified Model for the Adoption of Electronic Word of Mouth on Social Network Sites: Facebook as the Exemplar. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 22(2), 202-231.
Al-Adwan, A.S., Kokash, H. (2019). The Driving Forces of Facebook Social Commerce. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 14(2), 15-32.
Badilescu-Buga, E. (2013). Knowledge behavior and social adoption of innovation. Information Processing and Management, 49(3), 902–911.
Baker, J. (2011). The Technology–Organization–Environment Framework, Department of Management Information Systems, School of Business and Management, American University of Sharjah.
Baker, J. (2012). The technology-organization-environment framework, Information systems theory, Chapter 12, Springer publication.
Bano, M. and Zowghi, D. (2015). A systematic review of the relationship between user involvement and system success. Information and Software Technology, 58, 148-169.
Ben Yahia, I., Al-Neama, N. & Kerbache, L. (2018). Investigating the drivers for social commerce in social media platforms: Importance of trust, social support, and the platform perceived usage. Retailing and Consumer Services, 41, 11–19.
Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G. and Mol, M.J. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 825-845.
Busalim, A. H., Ghabban, F., Che Hussin, A. R. (2021). Customer engagement behaviour on social commerce platforms: An empirical study. Technology in Society, 64. doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101437.
Chen, C.H. (2011). The Rise of Co-Creative Consumers: User Experience Sharing Behavior in Online Communities, Ph.D. Thesis, Queensland University of Technology.
Cho, E., Son, J. (2019). The effect of social connectedness on consumer adoption of social commerce in apparel shopping. Fashion and Textiles. 6. doi.org/10.1186/s40691-019-0171-7.
Chong, A.Y.L., Lacka, E., Li, B., Chan, H.K. (2018). The Role of Social Media in Enhancing Guanxi and Perceived Effectiveness of E-commerce Institutional Mechanisms in Online Marketplace. Information and Management, 55(5), 621-632.
Damanpour, F. (2014). Footnotes to research on management innovation. Organization Studies, 39(5), 1265-1285.
Ford, N. (2005). New cognitive directions. In A. Spink & C. Cole (Eds.), New directions in cognitive information retrieval (pp. 81–96). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Friedrich, T. (2015). Analyzing the Factors that Influence Consumers’ Adoption of Social Commerce – A Literature Review, Twenty-first Americas Conference on Information Systems, Puerto Rico, 2015.
Friedrich, T., Schlauderer, S., Overhage, S. (2019). The impact of social commerce feature richness on website stickiness through cognitive and affective factors: An experimental study. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100861
Gottlieb, B. H., Bergen. A. E. (2010). Social support concepts and measures. Psychosomatic Research, 69(5), 511-520.
Hajli, M. (2013). A research framework for social commerce adoption, Information Management & Computer Security, 21(3), 144-154.
Hajli, N. (2013). A research framework for social commerce adoption. Information Management & Computer Security, 21(3), 144-154.
Hajli, N. (2015). Social commerce constructs and consumer’s intention to buy. Information Management, 35, 183–191.
Hajli, N., Sims, J. (2015). Social commerce: The transfer of power from sellers to buyers. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 94, 350–358.
Han, H., Xu, H., and Chen, H. (2018). Social commerce: A systematic review and data synthesis, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 30, 38–50.
Hecker, A., Ganter, A. (2013). The influence of product market competition on technological and management innovation: Firm level evidence from a large scale survey. European Management Review, 10(1), 17-33.
Hefetz, A., Warner, M. (2004). Privatization and its reverse: Explaining the dynamics of the government contracting process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 171-190.
Huang, Z.

  • Receive Date 03 June 2023