Standardization of Registering Alley and Street Names in Tehran in order to Organize Spatial Information

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Associate Prof., Iranian Research Institute for Information Science & Technology (IranDoc), Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Prof., Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc), Tehran, Iran
10.22034/aimj.2025.532980.1645
Abstract
The aim of the research is to standardize the registration of neighborhood and barzan names in Tehran to organize spatial information. The research method in this study is designed to identify and analyze the heterogeneity and dispersion of the registration of neighborhood and barzan names in Tehran qualitatively. This method includes collecting data in the field and using visual tools, as well as written recording. The target population consists of 7 districts of Tehran. Sampling was based on the Morgan and Krejci table, and the quantity of data collected was 384, which significantly represents the status of name registration in Tehran. Data collection was carried out using a multi-stage cluster method. In this method, several neighborhoods were selected from different districts of Tehran, and data were collected from each district. This approach allowed for the preparation of a diverse sample consistent with the statistical population of the status of name registration in different regions of Tehran. After clustering the data, information was extracted for the study in a non-random and purposeful manner. The percentage of data collected from region 6 was about 50%, and the remaining 50% was from regions 1, 2, 3, 7, 11, and 12. The research findings showed that Street signs in Iranian cities are written in Persian script, with their Latin equivalents also appearing on the sign. This practice dates back 150 years. Since then, there has been inconsistency in the way these names are transcribed into Latin characters. These inconsistencies are due to reasons such as the lack of a unified policy for transcribing names into Latin, the absence of a clear theoretical framework, and the ambiguity of Latin symbols for Persian letters. The diversity in the transcription of names is such that the Latin transcription differs from one region to another and from one street to another, and sometimes the Latin equivalent of a single name is written in two different ways on a single sign. There are also signs where a contradiction is observed on one side of the sign and in its Latin equivalent. In this study, various types of inconsistencies in the Latin transcription method of street names in the city of Tehran, from 8 districts and several neighborhoods in each district, and from among 384 examples and data according to the Morgan and Crysler table, were extracted, and then solutions were presented to standardize them. Obviously, the results of this study are not limited to Tehran and can be used to standardize the street signs of other Iranian cities.

Keywords


Adam, M. (2020). From Downing Street to Wall Street. A preliminary taxonomy for place name metonymy translation strategy. Jurnal Penerjemahan 7, 2, 83-101.
Berkemer, S. J. & Stadler, P. F. (2020). Street name data as a reflection of migration and settlement history. Urban Science, 4(4), 1-17 .DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci4040074
Carmona-Derqui, D., Gutiérrez-Mora, D. & Oto-Peralías, D. (2023). Tabulating and visualizing street-name data in the US and Europe. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 50(7), 1981-1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083231190711
Channa, S. M. (2022). Eroding History and Creating Myths: The Name-Game in Urban Delhi. Journal of Urban Ethnography, 12 (1), 65-75.
Dalgiç, E. N. & Yildirim Okta, B. (2023). Changing the identity of a place by changing street names: The process of renaming the streets of Üsküdar between 1927-1934. A/Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 20(1), 181-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58278/0.2023.1
Dalgıç, E. N. (2023). Redefining Urban Identity through Urban Toponymy: Istanbul’s Street Name Changes in the Turkish Early Republican Period (1927- 1934). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16963.99364
Irvine, P. M., Memela, S., Dlongolo, Z. N. & Kepe, T. (2021). Navigating community and place through colloquial street names in Fingo Village, Makhanda (Grahamstown). In Urban Forum (Vol. 32, pp. 333-348). Springer Netherlands.
Kashfi, E. (2023). The politics of street names: Reconstructing Iran’s collective identity. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 23(2), 122-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sena.12393
Lai, J., Lansley, G., Haworth, J. & Cheng, T. (2020). A nameled approach to profile urban places based on geotagged Twitter data. Transactions in GIS, 24(4), 858-879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12599
Mokwena, L. (2021). Blurring the boundaries between ‘urban’and ‘rural’: oral route directions and the invention of street names in Ulco and Delportshoop. South African Geographical Journal, 103(3), 303-318.
Oto-Peralías, D. (2018). What do street names tell us? The ‘city-text’as socio-cultural data. Journal of Economic Geography, 18(1), 187-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbx030
Ramadhan, A., Anggita, D. & Muladi, E. (2020). Street furniture design consultation signage for place’s name for Puri Kembangan fly over area. International Journal of Community Service Learning, 4(2), 139-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/ijcsl.v4i2.25128
Rusu, M. S. (2019). Shifting urban namescapes: Street name politics and toponymic change in a Romanian (ised) city. Journal of Historical Geography, 65, 48-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2019.07.001
Rusu, M. S. (2020). Street names through sociological lenses. Part I: Functionalism and conflict theory. Social Change Review, 18(Winter), 144-176.
Rusu, M. S. (2022). Gendering urban namescapes: The gender politics of street names in an Eastern European City. Names, 70(2), 11-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/names.2022.2233
Rutkowski, M. (2024). Polish Street Namesakes. General Characteristics and Preliminary Outline for Analysing Urban Space Names. Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne. Seria Językoznawcza, 31(1), 183-204.
Shackleton, C. M. (2018). Urban street names: An opportunity to examine biocultural relationships? PloS one, 13(7), e0200891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200891
Siame, P. (2025). Odonymic Analysis of Street Names in Lumwana Mine Township in Kalumbila, Zambia. Innovative Research Journal of Sociology and Humanities, 2(3), 14-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15166634
Ursini, F. A. & Samo, G. (2022). Names for urban places and conceptual taxonomies: the view from Italian. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 22(3-4), 264-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2021.1954186
Xiliang, G. U. O. (2018). Collective Memory and Cultural Symbol: on the Culture of Place Names in Zhengzhou Street. Journal of Landscape Research, 10(3), 73-75. DOI: 10.16785/j.issn1943-989x.2018.3.015
Zhang, H. (2018). Linguistic landscape in Nanchang: A look into the biliterate street name sign. International Journal of Arts and Humanities, 4(2), 52-59.
Zheng, A. & Lu, X. (2024). A Corpus-based Study on CE Translation of Street Names. Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science, 8(11), 2483-2489. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2024.11.004
Zheng, A. & Lu, X. (2024). A Corpus-based Study on CE Translation of Street Names. Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science, 8(11), 2483-2489. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2024.11.004
Zhu, P. & Zhang, N. (2022). Study on the Cultural Connotation of Street Names in Kunming City. In 2022 International Conference on County Economic Development, Rural Revitalization and Social Sciences (ICCRS 2022) (pp. 119-122). Atlantis Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220402.025

  • Receive Date 08 July 2025
  • Revise Date 14 July 2025
  • Accept Date 19 July 2025